ReviewsResearch verifiedChecked: August 14, 2026

Duskfade Metacritic Score and Review Breakdown

Duskfade has a Metacritic score of 79/100 from 15 critic reviews and a Generally Favorable label, as checked on August 14, 2026. The user score was still listed as TBD at that time.

Duskfade review footage

Current Duskfade Metacritic score

Metacritic displayed 79/100 from 15 professional critic reviews when checked on August 14, 2026. The site classified the result as “Generally Favorable.“Because Duskfade had launched only one day earlier, both the score and review count were still capable of changing.

Always pair this number with its date and sample size. A later visit may show a different average after additional publications are included, so 79 is a verified snapshot rather than a permanent rating.

Positive, mixed, and negative reviews

The visible distribution was 67% positive and 33% mixed, corresponding to 10 positive reviews and five mixed reviews. Metacritic showed no negative critic reviews in that 15-review sample. This distribution explains why a respectable average can coexist with noticeable criticism of specific mechanics.

An aggregate is not a single verdict. Publications used different scales and priorities, and their individual conclusions range more widely than the average alone suggests. See the Duskfade review roundup for the recurring strengths and complaints found across the collected reviews.

Duskfade user score status

The audience score was still marked TBD at the access time. Metacritic indicated that user scoring was expected to open on August 15 at noon Pacific time and requires at least four ratings before displaying an average. A reliable user score was therefore not available for this article to report.

Any later user score is Pending confirmation until the page is checked again. Early audience averages can also move sharply with a small number of ratings, so the count matters alongside the score.

Why other aggregate numbers differ

PCGamingWiki displayed a Metacritic figure of 78 in the collected material, while the live Metacritic page showed 79. That difference may reflect update timing, platform selection, or cached information; its exact cause is Pending confirmation. The directly checked Metacritic page takes priority here.

OpenCritic also uses its own publication pool and calculation, so its score should not be substituted for Metacritic’s. Differences between aggregators are normal when their included reviews and update schedules are not identical.